The capacity you need is on your calendar
⏰ Cutting meeting volume by 40% raised productivity by 71% in MIT research. That's close to a headcount-sized gain that costs nothing, and more!
Hello! You've arrived at What Actually Works 🤓
We break down the real strategies, decisions, and plays that actually move the needle in your marketing, and here it for today.
⏰ The capacity you need might already be on your calendar
Cutting meeting volume by 40% increased self-reported productivity by 71%, employee satisfaction by 52%, and reduced stress by 57%, according to MIT research on organizational meeting load. That’s not a minor efficiency tweak.
It’s close to the same order of magnitude as adding real headcount, except it costs nothing and doesn’t require a single approval from finance.
Most resourcing conversations start from the assumption that more work requires more people or more budget, and that assumption skips past a lever sitting in plain sight: how much of the team’s actual working time is already consumed by meetings that were never re-evaluated after they became recurring.
A team drowning in workload and a team drowning in meeting load look identical from the outside and require completely different fixes, and most teams never separate the two before asking for more resources.
Audit your team’s actual meeting load before assuming the problem is capacity
Most teams can estimate roughly how many meetings they run in a general sense. Few can state, as a number, what percentage of a working week that actually consumes across the team.
Pull a real calendar audit for two or three team members across a representative week and calculate the actual percentage of working hours spent in meetings.
If that number is anywhere close to the 20-plus-hour weekly loads increasingly common in hybrid teams, that’s capacity sitting unaccounted for in every resourcing conversation.
Apply the same scrutiny to recurring meetings that a budget line would get
A recurring meeting that was useful when it started rarely gets re-justified once it becomes a fixture, which means meetings tend to survive well past the point their original purpose stopped applying, unlike a budget line that gets reviewed annually.
Run every standing meeting through the same test a budget renewal would face: does this still need to exist at this frequency, with this guest list, for this duration? Kill or shrink anything that fails, the same way you’d cut a tool nobody uses.
Reinvest the recovered time deliberately, not by default
Cutting meeting load without a plan for what happens to the freed time just means it gets reabsorbed into whatever’s loudest that week, and the actual capacity gain never gets captured or measured.
It’s the same reallocation logic behind AirOps’ recent survey of 300+ CMOs and VPs, where 75.4% reported higher targets this year against only 43.0% who got any budget increase; the same gap freed-up time is meant to close before it quietly disappears again. You can get the full report here.
A 40% cut in meetings isn’t a wellness initiative. It’s close to a headcount-sized capacity gain that was already paid for.
Partnership with Insense
Your November Creator Roster Is Already Being Booked
BFCM is an expensive time to discover that a creator cannot sell your product. Late briefs and unusable assets leave your team scrambling as ad spend peaks.
Insense gives brands scaling beyond $2M a faster way to pressure-test their creator bench before peak season.
- Put products in creators’ hands early, so BFCM briefs come with product knowledge and content you already trust.
- Turn a $1,000 budget into up to 20 UGC ads from five creators, creating more hooks to test from every shoot.
- Connect Ads Manager to Insense’s performance dashboard to see which Partnership Ads and creators drive results, then rehire the strongest performers.
Insense provides access to 115,000+ creators across 57+ countries and is trusted by over 3500 brands like Il Makiage, Quince, Huda Beauty, and Monster Energy.
🐥 Tweet Worth Saving
🥳 Events
🔥 Where AI Actually Looks Before Recommending Your Brand
September 29 | 1 PM ET | Virtual Event
Using 3 million citation events across 81 enterprise software topics, Foundation CEO Ross Simmonds and AirOps’ Josh Spilker reveal which third-party sources influence AI shortlists. See where your category gets cited, which gaps cost consideration, and where your next content investment should go.
Can't attend the session live? Register anyway, and you’ll get the recordings in 24 hours.
🔥 Where to Put Your Next Growth Dollar Beyond Meta
October 29 | The Glasshouse, NYC | Free In-Person Event
Hear how Reddit CEO Steve Huffman thinks about discovery, how Cody Plofker helped scale Jones Road Beauty to nine figures, and how brands like Liquid I.V. and MANSCAPED use TV to drive measurable revenue. Bring your hardest acquisition question and leave with a sharper channel plan.
Thanks for being part of the WAW team 💃 We’d love to know if this was helpful so we can continue playing it smart with the right strategies.